TEHRAN - In a note, Jam-e-Jam dealt with Trumps recent statements including his admission that Iran is a strong country.It composed: Netanyahu stated that Iran has become weak, but Trump has a different opinion.
Iran has proven through numerous actions that it is strong.
Trump claims that Iran was compromised during his very first term due to optimal pressure and lack of money, but Biden reinforced Iran.
Trump claims that he included Iran in the first term, and now, due to Bidens policies, its conditions have actually improved and it has actually sold oil and, according to their claims, has disrupted the world.
The United States President wants to accomplish something for himself by praising Iran's strength and convincing the audience that we have reached an agreement with a strong Iran.
In fact, from this viewpoint, any weakening of Iran in Trumps eyes will result in criticism from critics against him who will argue: why did you negotiate or concur with a weak and beat country?Vatan-e-Emrooz: No possibility of negotiationIn a commentary, Vatan-e-Emrooz dealt with Trumps sanctions versus Iran.
It composed: One of the dangerous sanctions will reduce Iran's oil sales to no.
In addition to this sanction, the new United States government has started extensive negotiations and lobbying with some nations to cut their trade with Iran.
One of these pressures is connected to the Iraqi government.
It is pushing Baghdad to stop importing electricity and gas from Iran.
Trump imposed unprecedented sanctions versus Iran in his first term as president and then called for settlements with Iran to get maximum concessions from Iran at the negotiating table by applying maximum pressure.
This time, however, he is seemingly acting a little bit more intelligently.
He is seeking discussion and pressure all at once.
Naturally, in such situations, there is no possibility of settlement.
That is, the United States federal government must not be offered with the possibility of settlement.
Settlement in this case will probably result in much greater damage than the one caused by the JCPOA.Etemad: Smart diplomacyIn an article, Etemad discussed the recent advancements in the United States foreign policy toward Iran.
The paper stated: The current advancements in the foreign policy of the United States, especially Trumps specific statements about Iran, suggest modifications in the American technique towards the Islamic Republic.
Unlike his previous term (from 2017-2021, it seems Trump is now looking at the concern of Iran more realistically.
This modification of policy is influenced by American priorities in your home.
In such situations, the method Iran will handle these developments can be exceptionally definitive.
In the complicated formula that has been formed between Iran, the United States, and Israel, Tehrans choices will define the future course.
Our nation must adopt a policy based on rationality to prevent Washington from getting too near to Tel Aviv.
Upon a combination of diplomatic rationality and domestic reforms, Iran must choose a course that will protect national interests and lead the nation to counter existing challenges.Arman-e-Melli: Negotiation or sanctions ?! In an interview with Yousef Molaei, a senior expert in worldwide law, Arman-e-Melli assessed Trumps policy towards Iran and composed: Trumps view on Iran has actually been in some way moderated compared to the past, however convincing the international community of Tehrans serene nuclear activities needs discussion.
The worldwide neighborhood indeed seeks to be familiar with Iran's (nuclear) activities.
At the very same time, it is crucial to know by what mechanisms it wants to accomplish this awareness.
Nations worldwide have actually generally followed this through the International Atomic Energy Agency and by implementing the Additional Protocols.
That is, through invasive evaluations.
The Agencys electronic cameras are set up for this extremely factor.
Iran has its concepts that stand against the excesses of others.
This policy has actually caused these countries to have a doubtful view of Iran's nuclear issue.
For that reason, till there is no political understanding, it would not be possible to offer the essential grounds for reaching a contract on the nuclear problem.