TEHRAN-- Behrouz Kamalvandi, representative for the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI), spoke to journalism on Tuesday to respond to the allegations made by Rafael Grossi, the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
Stating that there is a monitoring vacuum and the reality that this vacuum is growing every day has no legal basis, since what Iran is not obliged to do today is associated with the 5 +1 contract with the Islamic Republic of Iran, which is defined as the JCPOA document.
The resurrection of the JCPOA must remain in accordance with the Strategic Action Law for the Lifting of Sanctions (embraced by the Iranian parliament) which entails the lifting of sanctions and the implementation of the obligations of the JCPOA celebrations in order to safeguard the interests of the Iranian nation, Kamalvandi specified.
He went on to note that the AEOI has actually fully worked together with the three sites the Agency is calling undeclared, adding that the simple observation of contamination in a few places can not be thought about as a sign of the existence of undeclared nuclear materials.
Iran has sent out data and answers to the Agencys inquiries.
It has also held discussion sessions to solve the uncertainties, Kamalvandi further discussed.
The representative explained that the IAEA needs to not make judgments based on some forged documents the Zionist routine supplied to the Agency with particular political objectives, keeping in mind that this kind of judgment is against the principle of the UN nuclear watchdogs neutrality and professionalism.As per the nuclear representative, this type of conclusion protests the treatment and recognized standards of the IAEA even with comparable cases in various countries.Kamalvandi likewise noted that these declarations are sadly rooted in the biased political objectives and objectives that the Israeli routine is leading.In conclusion, he advised the IAEA and Irans negotiating partners to the Vienna speak to prevent such encounters, which have not yielded any results so far.The International Atomic Energy Agency Board of Governors began its quarterly conference on Monday, with the Iran nuclear file, Ukraines Zaporizhzhia nuclear power station and AUKUS on its agenda.However, the meeting of the politicized body ended with more allegations versus Iran.In conformity with its required, the IAEA needs to deal with the countries nuclear program in a quite scientifically and professionally.
At the beginning of the conference, Grossi presented his report, which sounded quite political.In his declaration, Grossi stated, You have gotten my report entitled NPT Safeguards Agreement with the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Sadly, since my previous report, despite the Agencys stated readiness to engage with Iran without delay to solve these concerns, Iran has not engaged with the Agency.
Consequently, there have actually been no advancements in this reporting duration and none of the exceptional issues have been solved.
All of these safeguards concerns remain exceptional.
He included, Unless and up until Iran offers technically credible descriptions for the existence of uranium particles of anthropogenic origin at 3 undeclared places in Iran and informs the Agency of the present area(s) of the nuclear material and/or of the polluted devices, the Agency will not be able to validate the correctness and completeness of Irans statements under its Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement.
In line with his politically inspired statement, Grossi claimed, Because it has actually not yet done so, the Agency is not in a position to offer assurance that Irans nuclear program is exclusively peaceful.Later in the day, he talked to reporters and met a series of concerns relating to Iran.During the presser, he likewise said, I regret this (Irans so-called lack of cooperation).
This is not new, when the Agency is requiring specific things and Iran doesnt wish to or does not take part in the way one would not anticipate, and they implicate (the IAEA) of politicizing.
This is extremely straightforward.
We found traces of uranium in locations that were never ever stated, that were never expected to have any nuclear activity, and we are asking questions.
Discuss to me why this is a political activity.